Archive for the ‘thoughts’ Category

Film a day in your life … but which day?!

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

Last week i saw this article talking about Ridley Scott (and others) wanting people to film a small snippet of a day in their life and send it in to them:

On July 24, you have 24 hours to capture a glimpse of your life on camera. The most compelling and distinctive footage will be edited into an experimental documentary film, executive produced by Ridley Scott and directed by Kevin Macdonald.

I put the date in my diary and thought it might be nice to send in some footage because i’m one of those content contributor types.

This morning i saw an article on a much smaller blog and nearly dismissed it as an echo. Upon closer inspection though i realised this was a totally different project. It was a real Minority Report moment.

One Day on Earth Participant Trailer from One Day On Earth on Vimeo.

My interest was piqued. I had a quick look to try and work out who came first, the brand heavy, big names, sponsored to the eyeballs piece or the more open source style offering with an agenda. I wasn’t the only one to think the proximity, premise and trailers were a little suspicious:

day in the life comments
(These comments are on the mashable article i linked to earlier)

Now regardless of who came first (early signs indicate it was 10.10.10) the idea isn’t that original. I’m sure crowd sourcing a days worth of reportage footage has been done numerous times in the past. I know from my own personal experience that it’s a flickr favourite, dating at least as far back as 2005 in a project which is still running. So while the originality of the idea isn’t in question, i do think it’s a bit rich to take an idea with a noble cause (and ditch it) slap branding on it, throw some money and names behind a cushy prize and then have the audacity to trump the original project’s deadline in order to cross the finish line first.

Am i considering boycotting the Ridley Scott project now?
Yes.

Am i considering submitting footage to both?
Yes.

Would i only submit footage to one but not the other?
Yes, and i don’t think you need to be a member of Mensa to figure out which.

Somebody had best call the police. If i’m wrong i’ll happily eat humble pie. In all truth i hope i am wrong and 10.10.10 saw this project and thought “Hey, that’s cool… we could appropriate this idea to try and raise awareness on various issues”, but given the way they speak about making history, i fear not.

Right, what’s next. Oh yes, Pepsi… at least your heart PR wagon is in the right place i suppose.

Update: Shortly after posting this article, a member of the 10.10.10 project got in touch with me. While they were very careful with their words, it is my belief that the concerns i outlined around intellectual copyright are unfortunately all too valid.

Popularity: 22% [?]

Today was a good day for science. It’s the tomorrows that concern me.

Friday, May 21st, 2010

Craig Venter and his team have built the genome of a bacterium from scratch and incorporated it into a cell to make what they call the world’s first synthetic life form

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form

Watch the video. It’s really weird how they refer to DNA as software… but it’s terminology i can relate to and is a good layman explanation. The idea that you can now program a cell and ‘reboot’ it to take advantage of a new OS is the stuff of the movies.

Craig Venter, the pioneering US geneticist behind the experiment, said the achievement heralds the dawn of a new era in which new life is made to benefit humanity, starting with bacteria that churn out biofuels, soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and even manufacture vaccines.

However critics, including some religious groups, condemned the work, with one organisation warning that artificial organisms could escape into the wild and cause environmental havoc or be turned into biological weapons.

Melodramatic, but valid concerns. I’m more worried about the funding of shady research than the escape scenario. It would take a lot of money and man power but i’m sure the seedy underbelly of the world is eager to rise to the challenge. This is a warfare technology for the ridiculously early adopters, that is of course providing everybody manages to keep their trigger fingers off the nukes long enough to develop new and interesting ways to kill each other. Saddening stuff. I like to think, or at least hope weaponisation is a long way off, well actually i hope it never comes to that but we’re not really the most brotherly of species despite our intellect and potential for rational thought. Hopefully i’m just being hideously pessimistic as usual.

“Synthetic Genomic” (http://www.syntheticgenomics.com/index.html) it’s not quite as catchy as “Massive Dynamic” or “Umbrella Corporation”, but i fear it could rise to be a powerful as these fictional counterparts. “Watermarks” and “Signed genetic code”: All sounds a bit Bladerunner to me. Once again, science fiction is becoming science fact.

I think the really big question is, does genetic code have to compile?

Popularity: 13% [?]

Everyone seems to love uniqlo utweet but I think it’s a bit rubbish

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

This rant is about uniqlos utweet bit and was adapted from an email i just sent round the office.

Usually i’m a big fan of uniqlos digital work but i think the utweet viral(?) is really weak.

“QUICK, let’s cobble something twitter related together, kids love twitter.”
“What should it do?”
“Who cares! Just make it look ENGAGING!”

What annoys me about utweet is that it has basically dressed up the search function of twitter, made it useless and slapped some branded videos in there. The tweets move too fast to read comfortably so its value as a news aggregator is limited. If thought of as a piece of artwork it’s visually pleasing enough, but i can’t see why they bothered with the twitter data other than to say they’ve done a twitter project. Unless i’m missing something…

The calendar project by uniqlo is directly and sensibly tied in with their products. The colours of the freezed frame tie into the colours of the items. The uniqlo clock is designed purely to be admired, with very little interaction, and while this could be said of the utweet site they are very different in their set up. The clock is content to stand on its own merit, happy to be taken at face value and making no pretence of offering more than that which you see. I am asked to interact with utweet to get the ball rolling, and low the barrier for entry is as low as a click, if i am putting something into a system, i want to see the value in what is returned.

The utweet project is chopping static videos together with dynamic content, and as far as i can tell neither the video order or content have any relevance to what has been searched for on twitter. Why would i want to look at this, let alone share it? How has my life been improved by seeing vaguely related tweets whizz past (often in languages i can’t read anyway) and have tshirt designs thrown at me by cavorting hipsters?

The cal gives gorgeous, mellow, quirky videos, weather information and a browsable catalogue. Highly interactive if you chose for it to be, purely aesthetic if not. All that with an innovative new way of browsing clothes, thumbs up!

The uniqlo clock gives you the time, and occasionally a nicely choreographed skit. The time is useful, the skits less so. Let’s face it, we can find the time anywhere, so it’s mostly about the skits and they aren’t kidding themselves about it being anything more than something pretty which could happily sit in the background. As i say, they offered it as a screensaver, a niche it fits into perfectly.

Utweet gives you jovial individuals and a jingle. IF that was all, i wouldn’t feel so annoyed by it, but it’s the fact that it is cobbling on the twitter aspect to supposedly add some value but honestly, what value has been added by this fast moving text? I keep thinking i’ve missed something (have i?), like a hidden door which transports me to a world of worth but i can’t find it :(

I think i may be having a hard time splitting between usefulness with artistic merit, but this IS advertising. If i am going to be subject to an advertisement i’d rather it come in the guise of usefulness than art.

… and i hope that clearly explains why my thoughts behind why i think it’s a rushed, poorly thought out example of twitter integration. Social media shouldn’t just be shoved into a project because it’s a hot topic, but because it makes sense to use it.

(Incidentally, i did literally get out of the wrong side of bed this morning, but i felt the same way about it yesterday :) )

Popularity: 19% [?]

iPad

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

The office bought some iPaddage and i’ve been lucky enough to have a play. It’s everything Steve promised it would be: Gorgeous, simple, shiny, wonderful, nice…

iPad

Useful? Hmmm… I’m not convinced. I watched it bounce round the office this morning, and after absorbing a youtube video or surfing a few pages, people didn’t know what to do with it. I wasn’t bowled over when it was announced and i’m still not overly impressed now. As a device, it doesn’t really solve a problem and attempts to fit into a space that doesn’t need filling. I can’t find the original author of this quote, but i think it sums up my feelings nicely. From memory, it went something like this:

The ipad perfectly fits the gap between full sized laptop and phone. The thing is, i call that gap free time and i use it to get on with my life.

What the ipad WILL be great for is voraciously consuming internet generated news and media (something i am trying, rather unsuccessfully, to limit my intake of). I don’t want to be a consumer, i want to be a creator and anything that doesn’t easily lend itself to flexible creativity isn’t a thing i need in my life. Sure it’s nice to kick back and consume every once in a while, but i want to have the ability to jump into creativity mode at the drop of a hat. Be it code, simple idea jotting or something written (Unfortunately i can’t put photography in here because not everything can be a camera. Note to self, get a bionic eye soon) I REALLY don’t need to be encouraged to lounge around and swipe my finger endlessly over RSS feeds which will happily throw items at me until somebody drops the bomb.

Moving away from that gripe, as whether you want to be a creator or consumer is a personal choice, if you DO indeed wish to gobble media ad infinitum then this could be the device for you… but not if you plan to do any serious typing. I’d say i have an average, if not slightly above average hand span, yet held in portrait mode i can’t reach the ‘y’ button on the ipad keyboard. In fact that whole mid-section is a strain. This means to hit all the keys i’m going to have to type one handed while i hold this thing. Thanks for more than halving my productivity there apple. It’s bad enough i have no tactile feedback but now i can’t even use two hands to thumb peck at the keys?! Sure, I could buy the keyboard accessory (for $70), but then i need somewhere to set it down, and when it gets to that stage i’m going to start wondering why i didn’t just bring my netbook. At least that can stand up by itself, unlike this new born baby of the mobile computing world. Who wants to dock that thing in portrait mode anyway?!

… Ok, i can sense i have already edged into super rant territory. Anybody who has stumbled across this without really knowing me must be thinking i’m one of ‘those people’ who hates apple for the sake of it. You couldn’t be further from the truth. I am a recent convert to apple, now choosing to develop under OSX where i can. I also think the iphone is the best smartphone on the market, largely due to the app store being so forthcoming (There really is an app for pretty much everything). I’m just a realist, and the ipad would be the biggest waste of money for me since the macbook air. Here, to prove i’m not just bashing it for the sake of it let me mention some things i DO like about the ipad.

The orientation hold button. It’s brilliant. Bring that to the iPhone please. The whole big ipod touch thing is slick. I have no idea why i was surprised at how slick it was. I suppose in my head something bigger should move with a lumber (like an elephant!) but it didn’t and i was happy for that. Also the larger screen is really nice, that extra real estate means the UI for apps can be laid out a lot better. The pre-loaded apps, particularly youtube, shows off some nice split screening and in situ video playback which i hope to see more of from the imminent magazine app offerings. Unfortunately some applications developers can really make a hideous mess of user interfaces, but provided the right person is on the job that screen could be utilised very effectively. That’s the only thing that could make the ipad really appealing to me, a killer third party application. I think that’s where we’ve arrived at, a company with clout spits out the hardware and expects the users/coders to make it a success. In my opinion the app store was the shrewdest business move apple have made in a while. However until that killer app arrives, i’m going to stick to using the item in the background of my first photograph for my planning activities. A notebook and a pen. The day when i can free flow ideas into a meta tagging digital device and manipulate them moments later will be a happy one indeed.

Oh, and it’s mildly heavier than i (and judging from colleagues comments, most people) expected it to be, which is neither here nor there.

Unfortunately i can’t take a look at the apps on offer right now. As is often the case for early adopters (especially those who are going out of their way to become early adopters by skirting country codes (Lik-sang – RIP) ) there can be hurdles to overcome.

Ruh-oh...

Oh Apple, you have us bang to rights!

This is a bummer, but i think it’s for the best. If we (ok, maybe just me) had access to the app store there would be a hefty bill to pay and i wouldn’t have gotten any work done today. Or tomorrow. Thankfully it shouldn’t affect our immediate plans for el ipad (no, we’re not blending it), and a quick google suggests there are ways round this prior to UK release if it does prove to be a problem…

Anyway, those are my initial thoughts on the ipad, which is now covered in fingerprints.

Please Microsoft, bring out your rumored rival soon… I’d love for it to be an ipad killer but i fear you don’t know how to market a damned thing. Put more money behind your viral work because your print and TV campaigns are cringe inducingly irritating.

(… but considering even i have a hard time reading my writing at times means any handwriting based digital device like the microsoft courier is going to actually have to interface directly with my brain.)

Popularity: 53% [?]

Moleskine QR code

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Being a lover of tech you can imagine how delighted i was to see a QR code on my newly purchased moleskine. I don’t know when they started doing this so it’s new and exciting to me.

Moleskine QR

Imagine my disappointment when both iPhone and Sony Ericsson C902 failed to read and interpret it in the handset.

*Sad face*

Eventually i managed to get an image off the phone with a suitable resultion to run through this decoder:
http://zxing.org/w/decode.jspx
Which stated it wanted to go to the following URL:
http://www.moleskine.com/s.php?id=978-88-8370-102-3

Great success!

However, it would appear this success was short lived, as that URL currently throws a rather nasty mySQL connection error.

moleskine error

The variable matches the product code of this particular notebook, so i suspect the page would just tell me a bit more about it. Rather unnecessary considering i’ve already bought it. I appreciate in store this could be useful, though i find the no nonsense imagery on the front is more than adequate.

I guess there’s no real moral to this story, it was simply an unfortunate coincidence. I’m just happy to see a company like Moleskine, very much not in the digital space showing they’re still highly aware of it. I suspect they’re all a bunch of geeks too… but guys, you might want to make your errors a little more customer friendly when your database connection fails :)

Popularity: 22% [?]

Cool(ography)!

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

I’ve answered a few photography based questions for a post on the coolography blog. Hooray! It’s duplicated here for RSS subscribers, but if you’re on a computer i recommend you click through, as the site has tonnes of other interesting features.


We love London, and we love photography. Similar sentiments are shared by many, and often the love for both can be brought beautifully together – in particular, by friend of coolography, Stuart Gleave. Playful, colourful, imaginative – compositions that make us sit back and fall deeper in love with this city of ours. Having followed his work for some time, we felt a coolography feature was long overdue. Continue reading for a compilation of his favourite London shots as well as a short Q&A…

What is it about photography that grabs and channels your creative interest?
It’s the ease of being able to pick up a camera and create something beautiful that draws me to photography. I have always been moderately frustrated with my inability to draw so photography is an outlet for my creativity that satisfies the desire to create something visual. That and the precision encouraged by the craft. Composition, exposure, subject matter and timing all need to come together in harmony to create a photo I’m proud to display.

Tell us about how London, the city and its inhabitants, inspires you.

I’ve lived in London all my life, and as with anywhere you see every day it’s very easy to become accustomed to the sights. A number of years ago I decided to attempt to see London afresh, and the camera helped with that. Once you start looking for interesting compositions, or seeing in terms of frames, even the most familiar of sights reveal photographic opportunity. Noticings is a flickr based community looking to encourage this new way of seeing things. While keeping your eyes peeled is a philosophy that can be applied anywhere, when it comes to London specifically I’m very fond of the diversity on offer. Architecture spanning centuries, green spaces and countless backstreets offer exploration to anybody willing to embrace it.

…The diversity isn’t just limited to the buildings of course, and the variety of people you can encounter on a single day is not to be taken for granted. Friends visiting from out of town are often blown away by just how busy central London is. A half hour walk can take you from the city’s suit wearing bankers through the eclectic fixie toting Shoreditch crowd to the unscrupulous sales tactics of the characters on the curry haven that is Brick Lane. To the West, the pomp and circumstance of Westminster awaits, or if that seems too formal, Soho and its colourful nightlife are moments away. All this without even mentioning Covent Garden, Camden Town or the numerous markets and ever fresh list of events dotted around. My new years resolution is to try and take more in the way of portrait/street photography to get to know a little bit more about the people that make up the capital.

There is a strong use of colour that dominates many of your photos. Do you feel this highlights an aspect of a city that is traditionally viewed as dull and grey?

As you rightly point out, The Big Smoke isn’t best know for its colourful palette. I’ve not gone forward with an agenda of portraying a more colourful London, I think it’s just a byproduct of the style I’ve adopted for its aesthetic qualities. I’m fond of silhouettes and feel they’re best presented with a colourful backdrop. Similarly the sun is the best source of light you can hope for outside, and while it’s rare in the UK, on the occasions it does make an appearance, a clear blue sky is usually in tow. While I have taken numerous photos in the city during overcast and foggy conditions, they are rarely of London’s monuments, but of the people interacting with the weather.

A few of these shots have a quite playful theme; a london eye pod coddled by a cloud, canary wharf framed by arches; are these pre-planned or are they results of a whimsical shot?

Yes and no. No in that I just wander from A to B and yes in that when I see something that might make a nice photo, I plan how best to capture it. Just walking around, looking instead of seeing, will show something new every time. More often than not I’ll pick two tube stations with a famous landmark somewhere between them. If there’s something else in the scene which I feel will compliment that landmark, or indeed any less famous object of interest en route, then the planning kicks in. I’ll compose an ideal shot or two in my head and move to mimic it in the viewfinder of the camera, with varying degrees of success. If there’s movement involved, such as with the London eye or people photography, then there’s a period of time before everything falls into place and the shutter captures what you want. There’s usually a fair bit of waiting for any photo, be it waiting for the desired spark of emotion, the right weather, right light or just something interesting to add that special touch.

…That’s another great thing about London being so busy. If you pick any innocuous looking spot on a thoroughfare and wait long enough, something interesting is bound to happen. It’s just a matter of how long you’re prepared to wait for it, and whether or not the other factors will still be in balance when it does. I only stood pointing my camera at the millennium bridge for a few minutes before a jogger’s silhouette fell into frame. It was just fortunate that the sun was still illuminating the sky to provide a brilliant orange backdrop for him. The busy contrast he provides against the other two people in the frame was the special touch I was waiting for. It was one of the first pictures I took when I bought a more serious camera a number of years ago and it’s still a favourite of mine.

Lastly, what’s cool?
I like my gadgets and think they’re pretty cool, but only when they work of course. Nothing is more frustrating than being given grief by something that is supposed to make your life easier. I read Engadget for the majority of my tech news.

I also think so called ’social media’ is pretty cool, though the term is being used and abused by everyone under the sun lately. The advent of various sites like Twitter, Facebook and the like certainly makes the web a more friendly, personalised place. Photo sharing site Flickr is probably what’s kept me so actively interested in photography over the last few years. Even when there’s a lull in my shooting or inspiration runs dry, it’s nice to be able to browse really great photos from my contacts. I’d highly recommend it to anyone looking to get into photography, as it’s a great place to learn new techniques, get feedback on your shots or just find people with a common interest.

Social media has become quite a powerful force in the last few years. While traditional news outlets are very good at spreading a message in one direction, when it comes to feedback the other way they falter. The Internet easily allows individuals to organize themselves and get behind a cause. It’s pretty cool as it is, but the Internet, or particularly the ways in which we use it are going to get much much cooler in the future.

And if none of that floats your boat, then here’s a flamethrower made from bacon.

Popularity: 14% [?]

A post about phone operators/phones

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

So Orange and T-Mobile eh?

orange mobile

That’s a new one. The logo i’ve hastily fashioned makes me what a tequila sunrise. I know somebody who only yesterday was telling me they were ditching t-mobile (and their lovely HTC hero) for o2 because, while they loved the hero, t-mobile reception was pants. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out what their next handset will be.

I recently moved away from my beloved Sony Ericsson K610i:
K610i

To a Sony Ericsson C902:
C902

It was a tough move, after two years i finally got annoyed enough by the lack of decent camera in the k610i and went back to the cybershot range. So far i’m very pleased with the C902. The camera is much better, but i’m not sure i’m yet at David Bailey status with a phone. (Very annoyed that the gallery of images for that adventure still isn’t online, over a week late)

Here’s some examples of shots from flickrites with what i consider to be a minimal/acceptable level of retouching:

1

1

1

Maybe this will be my next phone. Finally, a model which solves my txt-ing and walking into people problem. The Sony Ericsson’s XPERIA Pure, with a translucent screen and contrast ratio to squint for:

Sony pureness
(source)

If they were able to up the contrast, this would actually be a really pointless but great looking screen. At the moment, it’s absolutely rubbish, sunlight will make it useless.

Popularity: 18% [?]

IKEA font

Friday, September 4th, 2009

A lot of people are talking about IKEA and their new font, but not many are trying to help them out. I am a doer, so here’s a mock up for an alternative font IKEA might have chosen.

ikea

So chill out font aficionados… it could have been a lot worse.

Popularity: 17% [?]

A Nigerian Prince with a social edge

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

This is my new favourite character on the Internet. Move over Kade (You fool…), there’s a new hotness in town and he is called Prince Obi.

Prince Obi is from Nigeria, and he needs our help transferring some money. Our learned friend has taken it upon himself to reach out to various branches in ‘the special ways of internet’ to bring us a message via twitter and youtube:

My favourite tweet has to be: “I do not want to steal your 24p, I want to give you $10 million. To prove I am genuine, I have established a facebook profile

It was filled with great sadness however when i couldn’t find the facebook profile in question :( Perhaps the man himself can hit us up with a link. Help us Prince Obi, you’re our only hope…

So… a week till we see our first Prine Obi Drum and Bass mashup? Fingers crossed.

(P.S. Whoever is behind this is quite brilliant)

Edit: Found the facebook account

Popularity: 32% [?]

Airplane toilets

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

You can’t use an airplane toilet during takeoff or landing, which is understandable, and basically means you can only use them once you are x thousand feet off the ground, where the views are often spectacular.

Mount Olympus

… So why don’t they have any windows like the rest of the plane?

mountain urinal
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/javiy/3335480245/)

Sure, it would be costly, and sure you don’t spend much time in the can on any given flight, but where else could you sit on the loo with a floor to ceiling window and overlook the world. And WHILE it may be costly, it’s a VERY small portion of the plane and might make that typically claustrophobic and unattractive place more than bearable. I suppose they want to get you in and out as fast as possible in cattle class, but while I’ve never travelled 1st class, but i’m sure this is just the kind of thing they’d go nuts over.

…Unless the airlines are worried about people looking in at 35,000 feet.

Popularity: 7% [?]